Study A
Does measured joint data train a better policy?
We train the same policy twice, once on measured joint angles and once on pose estimated from video, then compare success rates. The comparison gets cited a lot and has never been published.
Research
Both studies publish with the dataset. Every claim on the landing page links to its paper further down this page.
Study A
We train the same policy twice, once on measured joint angles and once on pose estimated from video, then compare success rates. The comparison gets cited a lot and has never been published.
Study B
We record force from a human hand, map it onto a robot hand that can feel, and run the whole path from recording to trained policy.
The sources, in full
01 / 05
Source · ablation study
34 authors · Stanford / Berkeley / NVIDIA / Meta affiliations · 2026
A 100-hour force-annotated demonstration corpus outperformed a 20,854-hour egocentric-video pretraining corpus on contact-heavy manipulation. The controlled ablation isolates the force channel itself: adding it moves success from 42% to 65%.
Open the paper →Source · fragile manipulation
2025 to 26 force-aware imitation literature
Policies that track a predicted force target succeed on fragile and deformable objects where force-blind baselines fail outright. The gap is 87% versus 0%. Without pressure feedback the policy cannot modulate grip at all.
Open the paper →Source · hand-pose benchmarks
Transformer hand-reconstruction benchmarks (HaMeR-class models)
On standard benchmarks, state-of-the-art hand-pose estimation scores roughly twice as well on visible joints as on occluded ones. During a grasp the fingertips are behind the object at exactly the frames that decide success. Measured joint sensing has no such failure mode.
Open the paper →Source · public-corpus survey
Survey of public manipulation corpora · 2026
Comparing public egocentric-video hours against the largest public force-sensing corpus yields a verified ratio of roughly 208:1. Video can be scraped from the internet; calibrated pressure at the moment of contact can only be recorded at the source. It does not exist anywhere else.
Open the paper →Source · Meta FAIR
Open-sourced force-sensing glove research · Meta FAIR
Meta’s own glove-sensing research states it directly: “video alone cannot capture the rich contact signals critical for mastering manipulation.” They open-sourced the sensor designs and shipped no product.
Open the paper →Side by side
The force column is where the table thins out.
| Data source | Finger position | Grip force | During contact (fingers hidden) |
Cost to scale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internet & egocentric video | Guessed from pixels | None | Accuracy halves | Cheap, scrapable |
| Vision hand-tracking | Estimated | None | Fails at the grasp | Cheap |
| Robot teleoperation | Robot joints | Rare, uncalibrated | Yes | A robot per operator |
| Simulation | Perfect but synthetic | No validated contact physics | Yes | Near-free |
| Digitus glove | Measured · 26 DoF @ 120 Hz | Calibrated · 0.1 to 100 N | Unaffected | Human-speed, no robot |
The episode format
Force and position land on one clock and export as LeRobot-compatible episodes. The sample below comes from the same grasp model as the animations on this site and carries a simulated watermark.
observation.joints float32[26] @ 120 Hz observation.force float32[3×3] normal + shear timestamp int64 one clock sync_offset_ms float32 <10 verifiedDownload a sample episode (simulated) ↓
The dataset
Leave an email and we will send the preprint and the download once they go live.